SHAKY WEEKES MAKES TRADE MORE LIKELY?
1) Even before the game in Buffalo the Rangers were looking for any reason to rid themselves of Kevin Weekes. The number of reasons seems to grow by the day.
2) First it was for being a locker room distraction. Making lewd and unwanted comments/overtures toward unsuspecting rookies in the showers. His salary of 2 mil/year. Finally the fact that he just plain sucks.
3) The problem lies in the fact that every other GM in hockey has to know about all this as well. However, if Lou Lamarello can trade a retired player, why couldn't Sather find a way to trade a sucky, overpaid, gay back up goalie?
4) The number of potential suiters though is small. Perhaps JD in St.Louis will do his old employer 'a solid' and take on Weekes for the remainder of the season? Stay tuned. We're fairly certain things won't stay status quo much longer on Broadway
1) Even before the game in Buffalo the Rangers were looking for any reason to rid themselves of Kevin Weekes. The number of reasons seems to grow by the day.
2) First it was for being a locker room distraction. Making lewd and unwanted comments/overtures toward unsuspecting rookies in the showers. His salary of 2 mil/year. Finally the fact that he just plain sucks.
3) The problem lies in the fact that every other GM in hockey has to know about all this as well. However, if Lou Lamarello can trade a retired player, why couldn't Sather find a way to trade a sucky, overpaid, gay back up goalie?
4) The number of potential suiters though is small. Perhaps JD in St.Louis will do his old employer 'a solid' and take on Weekes for the remainder of the season? Stay tuned. We're fairly certain things won't stay status quo much longer on Broadway